Uptake of sanitation technologies in Kampala: The case of Gulper technology


Prepared by: Gloria Nsangi Nakyagaba, University of Oklahoma (link )

Published: 14 March 2024

Last Updated: 14 March 2024

Download pdf

Key information

Location: Kampala; Uganda

Scope: City/town level

Lead organisations: Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA)

Timeframe: 2016 – 2024. 

Themes: Informal settlements; Environment; Health; Informality; Infrastructure; Innovation; Water and sanitation

Financing:

Funding sources: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (CWIS programme), Kampala Capital City Authority (sanitation campaigns), MTN Uganda (Kampala Water and Sanitation Forum), German Development Cooperation (GIZ) (Kampala Water and Sanitation Forum; call centre)

Approaches used in initiative design and implementation:

  • Business models to improve youth employment and income in informal settlements.
  • Creating incentives for the private sector to improve sanitation across the entire service chain.
  • Embracing heterogeneous approaches to sanitation infrastructure solutions.
  • Focus on service provision and its enabling environment, rather than on building infrastructure (a core concept behind the World Bank CWIS).
  • Licencing new technology to improve collection of faecal waste.
  • Using policy forums to build legitimacy of new sanitation technologies by garnering public and private sector support and stakeholder involvement.

Initiative description

Background and context

Kampala’s sanitation is characterised by both onsite and off-site infrastructure. Of these, onsite is dominant, with households mostly using pit latrines. This makes pit emptying and safe waste treatment critically important, as poor disposal poses serious health risks. For example, between 2010 and 2017, Kampala had several epidemic outbreaks of cholera and typhoid – causing several hundred deaths, health anxieties in the city, as well as high financial costs for both individuals and the government to mitigate and stop the disease outbreaks.

Kampala’s urban planning regulations, both from the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development and the city urban planning department, require that houses are connected either to the national sewer network or to septic tanks to allow cesspool emptying. However, only 2% of households in Kampala have their toilets flush to sewer and only 28% to septic tanks (Bateganya et al., 2019). The remaining majority is served by other well documented technologies, such as pit latrines and associated emptying services. One of these is the gulper, a manually operated pump for emptying septic tanks or pit latrine content into a container, which was originally developed by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine as an alternative technology (LSTHM, nd). In informal settlements, the gulper has a niche over other emptying technologies like the cesspool, particularly where roads and pathways to people’s homes are rather narrow and infrastructural limitations mean that many toilet facilities cannot be accessed by large cesspit-emptying trucks (Semiyaga et al., 2022). In Kampala, residents of informal settlements such as Kibuye have reported having their pit latrines and toilets locked down during Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) inspections, for not meeting sanitary requirements (Nakyagaba et al., 2021). The gulper technology attempts to solve problems like this, because the emptying equipment can be carried on a small tricycle through informal settlements’ access paths, enabling it to reach those facilities.

The cost of hiring gulper services is more affordable than those of the next alternative, cesspit emptying trucks. Gulper collection can also be done per 200 litres, at a rate of around UGX 20-30,000 (USD 5-8) per 200 litre barrel of sludge removed – enabling low-income households to spend only what they are willing and able. For a pit latrine, this allows sludge to be removed from a depth of approximately 1.5m into a 200 litre barrel. In contrast, cesspool services such as cesspool trucks, while offering a bigger capacity, require a single down payment of at least UGX 250,000 (USD 67), ten times more than the gulper costs and one which many households cannot afford. In addition, KCCA does not provide free waste management and/or subsidised sanitation services in informal settlements, leaving these exclusively to the private sector, at higher costs to households. For example, households are now asked to pay around UGX 25,000 (USD 7) per month for solid waste collection. When solid waste collection is unaffordable, many households resort to disposing of their solid waste irregularly, including into pit latrines, causing these to fill up quickly and presenting emptying challenges because cesspool hose pipes are not designed to transport waste other than faecal sludge. Gulpers, in contrast, can facilitate removal of solid waste as well as faeces during the emptying process, again making them preferred in informal settlement communities. These advantages have prompted KCCA to license and pilot the gulper technology across Kampala, as described in this ACRC urban reform case study.

Summary of initiative

Prior to the gulper, Kampala had seen pilots of onsite sanitation technologies (for example, urine-diverting dry toilets) through projects including the 2013-17 Kawempe Urban Poor Sanitation Improvement Project (KUPSIP) and introduced by local NGOs, including Community Integrated Development Initiatives (CIDI Uganda) and ACT Together Uganda. Most of these earlier toilet technologies were implemented in low-income and informal settlements with the goal of improving sanitation in areas not reached by city sewer lines. Despite the precedent for onsite sanitation technologies, in 2015 several unauthorised gulper operators were arrested by KCCA for using an unlicensed technology and their equipment seized (Nakyagaba et al., 2021). The gulper technology had been circulated to operators affiliated to an international NGO, Water for People, and without the knowledge of KCCA, which oversees city sanitation through its Directorate of Public Health and Environment. Their arrest led to engagement between Water for People and KCCA to improve the city authority’s understanding of the technology’s potential benefits.

Subsequently, when KCCA formed the Kampala Water and Sanitation Forum in 2016 to streamline and raise support for sanitation operations in the city, Water for People was one of the participating partner organisations. Other members included the National Water and Sewerage Corporation, MTN Uganda (a telecom company that provided funding) and the German Development Cooperation (GIZ). The forum led to the establishment of a set of “minimum standards for onsite sanitation technology options” (KCCA, 2016), and to the adoption of gulper technology as a pilot. Starting in 2016, gulper operators were able to associate and given licences to operate in the city.

When the gulper was introduced in Kampala by Water for People, the CSO trained youths to operate it. Upon partnership with KCCA when the governing body accepted the technology on a business-model pilot project, youths trained by Water for People became entrepreneurs, pioneering the gulper technology in various places across the city (Nkurunziza, 2017). The business model was a private–public partnership aimed at increasing sanitation service levels across the city by (mostly small) private businesses with support from KCCA.

To operationalise the model, KCCA assigned the entrepreneurs to each of the five divisions of the city, although each entrepreneur was not restricted to that particular division. This was rather to ensure that every city division had an entrepreneur operating the gulper technology. Each entrepreneur was required to have business premises in their assigned division. For instance, in Kawempe division, Terikigana Co Ltd was located on Tula Road, while Forever Sanitation was located on Hoima road and Sir Apollo on Kagwa Road. Start-up capital was provided by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation through KCCA, and Water for People provided start-up kits on a loan basis, including protective equipment, barrels and the gulper pump. Once the faecal sludge is collected, it is transported to and discharged in the Lubigi sewage treatment facility, one of the city’s treatment plants operated by the National Water and Sewage Corporation. Another CSO, CIDI, introduced transfer tanks remodelled from old KCCA cesspool trucks to increase the capacity that entrepreneurs can transport to the sewage treatment plant at once. Although this was briefly helpful, entrepreneurs soon began to distance themselves from the transfer trucks over high costs, resorting instead to hiring their own trucks from individual (private) transport operators in the city.

KCCA set up a general sanitation call centre which would, among other functions, monitor the gulper pilot operations and respond to public enquiries – for example, citizens seeking licensed service providers or providing feedback on gulper sanitation services. Overall, the call centre found urban residents receptive to the technology. Some callers directly requested gulper services, while others became aware of it when calling to make general inquiries. Further research within informal settlements communities where the technology was in use also found a positive reception of the technology – although in interviews, community members refrained from identifying who the operators were, for fear that these services were still illegal (Nakyagaba et al., 2021) (see also the Understanding Limitations section, below). In other communities, KCCA utilised local leaders and local government structures, such as local councils and village health teams, to spread awareness about using gulper as an alternative pit-emptying technology in hard-to-reach areas and for clients having thick sludge.

Notwithstanding the “minimum standards” mentioned above, actions to promote gulper technology remain in contrast with KCCA’s directorate of physical planning and the Ugandan Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development regulations. However, in the urban neighbourhoods where it has been used, there is consensus that the technology has improved service delivery and health in general. Since gulper’s official inception in 2016, faecal sludge collection and transportation has improved from below 400m3 daily (KCCA, 2017b) to 911m3 (KCCA, 2020: 2) in retrospective comparison to conditions experienced prior to the introduction of gulper pumps.

World Bank Citywide Inclusive Sanitation initiative. Kampala is one of the participating cities in the World Bank’s Citywide Inclusive Sanitation (CWIS) initiative. Since late 2018, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has provided USD 4.3 million to KCCA, with one of the ambitions to “increase the volume of faecal sludge that is safely managed to 80%, and the volume safely managed in informal settlements to 60% by facilitating access to improved onsite sanitation services, primarily targeting the poor and underserved”. Latter stages of the gulper pilot described in this case study were funded through this citywide sanitation project, which is planned to run from 2018 to 2024.

Target population, communities, constituents or "beneficiaries"

Low-income residents of Kampala’s informal settlements benefit from a cleaner environment and more hygienic toilets, which could otherwise be locked down by KCCA for not meeting minimum sanitary standards. Vendors and users of informal markets such as Ggaba market also benefited from cleaner public toilets and cheaper service providers. Ggaba is a risky environment because it is located on the shore of Lake Victoria and poses serious contamination risks to the lake – for example, in 2015 when typhoid broke out in Kampala, Ggaba food vending was temporarily halted by health governing bodies until the toilet standards, including emptying, were met.

While people still pay for gulper services, the KCCA also holds campaigns (KCCA, 2021; KCCA, 2017a), during which time households in selected informal settlements can access subsidised gulper or cesspit emptying services.

ACRC themes

The following ACRC domains are relevant (links to ACRC domain pages):

The policy shifts made by the Kampala Water and Sanitation Forum to accommodate new sanitation technologies highlight research themes of the ACRC domains of youth and capability development and neighbourhood and district economic development. The pilot gulper operations have been run on a business model focused on providing employment to mainly youth operators. And the way in which the gulper initiative has been introduced meant that neighbourhoods benefiting from the intervention also became sites of job creation in the process (Lwasa, 2019). This included the recruitment of young people to operate gulper-serviced units, which consisted primarily of youth being involved in the emptying of pits. This provision of employment to unemployed young people was not without controversy, since youth involved were linked to family who supported local council leaders around elections (Nakyagaba et al., 2021). Through this, youth involved are integrated into new organised modes of faecal disposal, thereby experiencing both an improvement in their individual livelihood outcomes and an improvement in their neighbourhood economy.

Health, wellbeing and nutrition. The initiative emphasises the importance of innovative approaches to faecal sludge management in Kampala’s informal settlements, where insufficient sanitation provision and inadequate service, have, as noted above, produced health risks for the community in the past. The gulper pump technology and the improvements registered through its use underline the linkages between informal settlement service upgrading and health.

What has been learnt?

Effectiveness/success

Clear standards by which to measure the gulper pilot’s success only go as far as the environmental protection laws and policies governing infrastructural development that are implemented by Uganda’s national environmental management authority (NEMA) and Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development – to which KCCA adheres on its properties in the city. Beyond these, KCCA has developed guidelines on minimum standards for on-site sanitation and faecal sludge management, to which households and sanitation operators using and serving onsite technologies must adhere. International standards, such as those by World Health Organisation, were regarded by KCCA and NWSC as too detached from Kampala’s reality to be recognised.

Analysis of the gulper pilot's successes is drawn from a study looking at experiences of the technology's uptake in three informal settlements (Kibuye I, Makindye Division); Bwaise I, II and III, Kawempe Division; Kasubi, Lubaga Division) and one food market (Ggaba, Makindye Division) across four of Kampala’s five city divisions, Informal settlements (Nakyagaba et al., 2021). Overall, this research found the sanitation initiative successful because it increased faecal sludge collection from residential settlements and its treatment at designated plants. The gulper pilot aimed at providing operating licences in particular to youth who had formerly worked emptying toilets in informal settlements, often discarding raw faecal sludge in the environment. Consequently, there has been a significant change in public health in informal settlements of Kampala, with about 500 m3 of additional sludge removed from communities daily since the inception of the pilot.

KCCA monitors operators to ensure proper dumping of waste, which should go to a treatment plant. KCCA also collects feedback from clients to ensure customer satisfaction. KCCA research also suggests a 63% increase in income for sanitation entrepreneurs (Bateganya et al., 2019) stemming from an aggregate of above 4,000 private sector emptying trips every month.

Success for this initiative connects with four of the preconditions which the ACRC has identified as catalysts for urban reform. These are: organised citizens; reform coalition; politically informed and co-produced project design; and enhanced state capacity.

Organised citizens. Gulper operators have formed an association called the Kampala Gulper Operators Association to help them lobby for incentives and receive operating licences from the government. NEMA would not give a licence to individuals and therefore, KCCA’s recognition of this technology and subsequent association enabled the successful acquisition of a licence. Without the licence, operators could not deposit collected waste at the treatment plants because they had no proof of meeting environmental standards in their operations. Many were accused of depositing raw faecal sludge in wetlands which landed them in difficulties with KCCA until they were licensed.

Reform coalition. The Kampala Water and Sanitation Forum can be considered a form of reform coalition. Since 2016, it has brought together local and national government agencies and utilities, civil society, international funders and the private sector. The forum has effectively streamlined and raised support for sanitation operations in the city, leading for example to Kampala’s inclusion in the Gates-funded CWIS initiative, as well as informing the development of the previously mentioned minimum standards for onsite sanitation technologies, which aim to better address the reality of sanitation service needs in informal and underserved settlements and markets.

Politically informed and co-produced project design. Gulper technology is an initiative that has benefited from the support of the KCCA as well as other state actors in its implementation. Since the technology itself had been in use in settlements prior to its official implementation, this included the support of government authorities in encouraging innovative solutions that work for low-income dwellers. This was achieved through the reconfiguration of governance arrangements to ensure a smooth introduction of the initiative and to remove administrative and bureaucratic obstacles.

State capacity. In adjusting to structural obstacles that prevent the KCCA from introducing traditional or, as alternatively conceptualised, “modern” sanitation infrastructure throughout the city, there has been support from the city authority in piloting the implementation of gulper technology in selected areas. This has been manifested in the training and participation of institutional representatives not just in the pilot intervention, but also in the broader rollout of the infrastructural intervention throughout the settlements where gulper technology was introduced. Despite the politics that involved the introduction of the initiative, this unity showcases the importance of state support in the introduction of new sanitation solutions in informal settlements.

Understanding limitations

To promote the new technology, the youth entrepreneurs engaged in door-to-door marketing campaigns in their assigned areas, sometimes paying local council leaders, village health team members and municipal health officials to convince community members to employ gulper services for their emptying needs. Additionally, KCCA’s call centre promoted the technology by referring and connecting callers to operators at no cost. Many community members were, however, not initially inclined to employ the gulper entrepreneurs’ services, apprehension largely stemming from the misconception that this method of emptying was still not allowed by the government. Cesspool trucks had for the longest time dominated the market and people believed this method to be the only way for desludging their toilets. Local council leaders were thus instrumental here in changing perceptions because community members trusted that they knew KCCA’s policies, which is why the gulper entrepreneurs sought their assistance.

Cultural beliefs around sludge handling have limited uptake of the technology and awareness-raising efforts are ongoing to help community members gain a better understanding of safe sanitation and proper waste handling. Some community members also shunned the methods of gulper operators on grounds of restrictive gender norms, and religious and cultural beliefs against which operations of the gulper were deemed unsanitary. In particular, individuals of the Muslim community opposed what they called direct contact with humans and faeces. Misunderstandings also soon broke out between Water for People and the gulper entrepreneurs over loan repayment for kits, resulting in some of the latter breaking ties with the organisation.

KCCA provided mobile trackers to gulper operators, to monitor their operations and ensure protocols were being followed. This was received with mixed reactions: operators felt they were being spied upon, resulting in autonomy-seeking behaviour such as dropping the mobile trackers in toilets. This further strained information gathering in the pilot process, which was to be used as basis for evaluating the initiative.

State support for sanitation infrastructural projects in Kampala has been known to cease when funding stops – this has recently been the case with eco-san toilets and “Vacutag”, for example – and whether the gulper will follow the same trend remains unclear (Lwasa and Owens, 2018; AfDB, 2012; and Carlesen, et al., 2008, all mentioned in Nakyagaba et al., 2021, footnote 2).

Potential for scaling and replicating

While KCCA has implemented the gulper pilot across all five of Kampala’s divisions, gulper operators also serve households beyond these borders and into the Greater Kampala metropolitan area that includes the districts of Mukono and Wakiso.

In its CWIS sanitation initiative, Kampala has also become a model to other cities in Uganda.

Participating agencies

Name
Type
Role in Initiative
Government (municipal)
Lead organisation; Implementation
Development/humanitarian
Funder
Bilateral
Funder
Kampala Local Councils I and II
Government (local)
Implementation (marketing gulper technology in their areas)
Government (national)
Issues licences (gulper operating)
Government (national) utility
Service provision (sewage treatment)
Village Health Teams
Community health volunteer groups organised under Kampala Local Councils I and II
Implementation (marketing gulper technology for operators)
Civil society
Training

Note: Local councils are the only ones not represented at the Kampala Water and Sanitation Forum. All other parties in the table are represented.

Further information

References

Bateganya, NL, Nkurunziza.A and Namirembe. EG (2019). Setting a Foundation for Citywide Inclusive Sanitation. Kampala: Kampala Capital City Authority.

KCCA (2021). Weyonje Sanitation Challenge. Kampala: Kampala Capital City Authority. Available online. (Accessed 14 March 2024).

KCCA (2020). Kampala Sanitation Improvement and Financing Strategy. Hydrophyl. Available online [pdf] (accessed 12 March 2024).

KCCA (2017a). Piloting a mobile sludge transfer tank in 5 parishes of Kampala. Kampala: KCCA. Available online. (Accessed 1 October 2023).

KCCA (2017b). Kampala Faecal Sludge Management Project. Kampala: KCCA. Available online (accessed 12 March 2024).

KCCA (2016). “Public health guidelines for faecal sludge management: Minimum standards for sanitation, and occupational health and safety in Kampala City, Uganda”. Available online [pdf] (accessed 12 March 2024).

London School of Tropical Hygiene and Medicine (LSTHM). The Gulper. Engineering for Change solutions library. Available online. (Accessed 14 March 2024).

Lwasa, S (2019). Uganda offers lessons in tapping the power of solid waste. The Conversation. Available online (accessed 14 March 2024).

Nakyagaba, GN, Lawhon, M, Lwasa, S, Silver, J and Tumwine, F (2021). “Power, politics and a poo pump: Contestation over legitimacy, access and benefits of sanitation technology in Kampala”. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 42: 415-430.

Nkurunziza, AG, Bateganya, NL Byansi, JZ, Rokob, J and Busingye, J (2017). Leveraging FSM to Close the Urban Sanitation Loop in Kampala. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Available online. (Accessed 14 March 2024).

Semiyaga, S, Bamuhimbise, G, Apio, SC, Kinobe, JR, Nkurunziza, A, Lukooya, NB and Kulabako, R (2022). “Adequacy of vacuum and non-vacuum technologies for emptying faecal sludge from informal settlements of Kampala City”. Habitat International 125: 102596.

Cite this case study as:

Nakyagaba, G.N. (2024). "Uptake of sanitation technologies in Kampala: The case of Gulper technology". ACRC Urban Reform Database Case Study. Manchester: African Cities Research Consortium, The University of Manchester. Available online.


Comments


Thanks for your contribution. Comments are moderated and we may remove any sensitive content. Name and organisation will be displayed with your comment. Email addresses are not displayed.